Home | Forums | Contact | Search | Syndication  
 
 [login] [create account]   Monday, April 29, 2024 
 
slxdeveloper.com Community Forums  
   
The Forums on slxdeveloper.com are now retired. The forum archive will remain available for the time being. Thank you for your participation on slxdeveloper.com!
 External Development Forums - SalesLogix OLEDB Provider
Forum to discuss using the SalesLogix OLE DB Provider from external applications (including usage of built-in provider procedures). View the code of conduct for posting guidelines.
Forums RSS Feed


 Back to Forum List | Back to SalesLogix OLEDB Provider | New ThreadView:  Search:  
 Author  Thread: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.
Joshua Carmody
Posts: 8
 
The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 04 May 06 2:38 PM
fiogf49gjkf0d
I'm trying to connect to a SalesLogix 6.2 database via the OLE DB Provider, inside an ASP.NET page. The webserver running the ASP page and the SalesLogix server are on separate machines. I intalled the SalesLogix OLE DB provider on the webserver machine using the MSI in the "Client OLE DB Provider" folder on the SalesLogix install CD. I then used a UDL file to create the connection string on the webserver, and when I hit "Test Connection" from the UDL configuration dialogue everything checks out. However, when I try to run the ASP page I get the following error:

Server Error in '/' Application.
The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.

.
.
.
Anyone have any ideas? This is the connection code I'm using in ASP:

dim dbconn,sql,dbcomm,dbread
dbconn=New OleDbConnection("Provider=SLXOLEDB.1assword=PASSWORDersist Security Info=True;User ID=ADMIN;Initial Catalog=SLXTEST;Data Source=THESERVERNAME;Extended Properties=PORT=1706;LOG=ON")
dbconn.Open()
[Reply][Quote]
Ryan Farley
Posts: 2265
slxdeveloper.com Site Administrator
Top 10 forum poster: 2265 posts
 
Re: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 04 May 06 3:17 PM
fiogf49gjkf0d
It could be the provider didn't install right for all users (and is only working for the current user). Maybe try running the ASP.NET service under the same account (temporarily of course) and see if it changes things.
[Reply][Quote]
Joshua Carmody
Posts: 8
 
Re: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 04 May 06 4:00 PM
fiogf49gjkf0d
Thanks for the reply. I'm not sure how to run the ASP.NET service under a different account, as it doesn't appear to be listed in the Services manager in Control Panel. But I did install the OLE DB provider using the Administrator account on the system. Shouldn't that work?
[Reply][Quote]
Jayne Pruiett
Posts: 3
 
Re: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 05 May 06 8:50 AM

naltrexone weight loss reddit

naltrexone weight loss
fiogf49gjkf0d
Yes, it should work. You should also make sure all users of the service on that machine have local Admin permission i.e., slxserviceuser, etc.,
[Reply][Quote]
Kris Halsrud
Posts: 88
 
Re: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 05 May 06 9:47 AM

symbicort generic inhaler price

symbicort generic availability treendsolutions.co.uk symbicort generic canada

zoloft and weed interaction

zoloft weed interaction
fiogf49gjkf0d
I have found on some versions of SLX, the MSI for just the OLEDB client installed but the provider was not listed under the provider types. Instead if you install a client app (like the sales client, or admin) it did correctly allow the provider to be seen in the list. If you can not figure it out you could try installing the admin with a minimal install and see if that allows you to choose the provider.

Sorry I don't remember what version the provider install had this problem and I have not tried to install just the provider in a while.
[Reply][Quote]
Joshua Carmody
Posts: 8
 
Re: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 05 May 06 10:35 AM

nix pris

nix creme matas
fiogf49gjkf0d
Still not working. Hmm... I don't need to have SalesLogix client installed on the machine, do I? I thought the OLE DB driver would be enough.

No matter what I try, ASP.NET refuses to acknowledge the provider.
[Reply][Quote]
Ryan Farley
Posts: 2265
slxdeveloper.com Site Administrator
Top 10 forum poster: 2265 posts
 
Re: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 06 May 06 12:30 AM

buscopan

buscopan aruls.net
fiogf49gjkf0d
No, you don't need the client installed. I have several web servers with only the provider installed (I just installed the same thing you did) and I've never had this issue. It very well could be permissions of the ASPNET process user. Could it be that this account has been locked down that could prevent a problem? Just an idea.
[Reply][Quote]
Joshua Carmody
Posts: 8
 
Re: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 08 May 06 2:32 PM

zoloft weed interaction

zoloft and weed
fiogf49gjkf0d
Can anyone tell me where to look to clear up any security or permissions problems? I've already made sure IUSR_COMPUTER and ASPNET have read/execute permissions on c:\program files\saleslogix. Where else should I look? I'm running Windows 2000 Server on the web server.
[Reply][Quote]
Joshua Carmody
Posts: 8
 
Re: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 09 May 06 12:48 PM
fiogf49gjkf0d
To see if I could bypass any security problems I might be experiencing, I created a web.config file in the folder of my application as follows:

<configuration>

<system.web>
<identity impersonate="true" userName="administrator" password="systempassword" />
</system.web>

</configuration>


...Unfortunately, it didn't help. I still get the "provider not registered" message.
[Reply][Quote]
Joshua Carmody
Posts: 8
 
Re: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 11 May 06 12:44 PM
fiogf49gjkf0d
I finally got it to work. For some reason the OLEDB driver was only installed for the Administrator account. When I logged in as another user, who was also a domain administrator, I couldn't connect, not even with the UDL connection test. I didn't know how to install the OLEDB driver for all users, since the MSI doesn't seem to have that effect, but I installed the Saleslogix network client on the server and that seemed to solve the problem.
[Reply][Quote]
Fabian
Posts: 1
 
Re: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 30 Apr 10 4:51 AM
Awesome....this worked perfectly for me having battled with same issue for several hours i only got it to work after installing the Saleslogix Network Client on the server. Many Thanks
[Reply][Quote]
Mark Hanford
Posts: 131
 
Re: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 12 May 10 7:56 AM
Does the provider that ships with 7.2.1 work on a 64-bit Windows Server 2008 platform? I'm having the same problem as this, but installing the client hasn't helped. (Although the client does work, and trying it out in the SLX connection manager works)
[Reply][Quote]
Phil Parkin
Posts: 819
Top 10 forum poster: 819 posts
 
Re: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 12 May 10 9:29 AM
I'm pretty sure you need 7.5 for that platform.
[Reply][Quote]
Mark Hanford
Posts: 131
 
Re: The 'SLXOLEDB.1' provider is not registered on the local machine.Your last visit to this thread was on 1/1/1970 12:00:00 AM
Posted: 12 May 10 9:41 AM
Ah, that makes sense then. I'll spin up an older x86 VM with 2003.
[Reply][Quote]
 Page 1 of 1 
  You can subscribe to receive a daily forum digest in your user profile. View the site code of conduct for posting guidelines.

   Forum RSS Feed - Subscribe to the forum RSS feed to keep on top of the latest forum activity!
 

 
 slxdeveloper.com is brought to you courtesy of Ryan Farley & Customer FX Corporation.
 This site, and all contents herein, are Copyright © 2024 Customer FX Corporation. The information and opinions expressed here are not endorsed by Sage Software.

code of conduct | Subscribe to the slxdeveloper.com Latest Article RSS feed
   
 
page cache (param): 4/29/2024 11:12:56 AM