7/4/2025 5:33:23 PM
|
| |
| slxdeveloper.com Community Forums |
|
| |
|
|
The Forums on slxdeveloper.com are now retired. The forum archive will remain available for the time being. Thank you for your participation on slxdeveloper.com!
Forum to discuss the use of the SalesLogix Web Platform, Client and Customer Portals, and the Application Architect (For version 7.2 and higher only). View the code of conduct for posting guidelines.
|
|
|
|
Conversion to 7.5 Web-Combine C_extension tables with core?
Posted: 10 Sep 09 11:06 AM
|
We are soon upgrading to 7.5 from 7.2 AND converting from Client Server to Web. In previous versions core tables were locked down and therefore, we have numerous 1-to-1 extension tables off of the core tables such as Account, Contact, Opportunity. Now that fields can be added to core SLX tables are people combining these tables? Are there performance concerns or guidelines to consider when contemplating merging these tables into one?
Jeff |
|
|
|
Re: Conversion to 7.5 Web-Combine C_extension tables with core?
Posted: 10 Sep 09 12:01 PM
|
We went through this conversion and let me tell you, there are some gotchas that you need to consider:
- If your users heavy utilize Group or Mail Merge, you would have to manually revisit each one of them.
I was doing this for about 4,000 users, and they had plenty of groups. I somewhat automated the conversion by programatically altering the Group and the Mail Merge definition, but I still got a big margin of error, probably close to 10%
- The DBAs did bring up the point that even though SQL allows for bigger row definitions. There are some technical issues on how SQL handles large rows which breaks them appart and may make query them a bit slower.
In our case we were able to prove that our actual row size was quite small (thanks to varchar fields), so we were allowed to proceed.
Obviously, the advantage is that the data, in this case is faster to read and you require less indexes, Joins, etc to read the data.
Guidelines ?
Don't rename the fields
Don't change the schema
Someone working with me modified the schema of a field (and some field names) but that is what lead to my 10% margin of error on the Automated "Migration" of groups and Mail Merge Templates.
|
|
|
|
You can
subscribe to receive a daily forum digest in your
user profile. View the site code
of conduct for posting guidelines.
 Forum RSS Feed - Subscribe to the forum RSS feed to keep on top of the latest forum activity!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|